|Saw: what number again|
October 29th, 2007 [12:28:23]
Brandon: I "saw" this film, and thought it was complete crap. The third film made more sense then this one. The more they make, of these movies, the more I'm stating to hate them.
|For Braindead Rednecks Only|
October 30th, 2007 [1:06:30]
Matmico: I was dragged to this film on a first date by a gal who is into horror movies. I enjoy a few good ones, The Shing, The Serpent And The Rainbow, etc. I hadn't seen the previous installments because I had little interest in the storyline. My grade is a O because negative 100 wasn't an option.
Now the question. What the hell is the point of this "movie" if it qualifies as one. My suggestion is to avoid this movie while you still have the will to live.
Our brilliant storyline starts with some bad dude being given an autopsy. From there it gives endless scenes of torture and the movie ends. Wow, how ingenious. the Marquis de Sade would be proud. Thats the whole storyline. How anyone finds this entertaining speaks to their intelligence. I knew I was in for trouble when a redneck sitting closeby was yelling to "cut his head off". Kind of speaks to the quality of people who enjoy this brilliant piece of moviemaking. Calling this a film is being very loose with the language.
This movie is one of the absolute worst, and should be the subject of much ridicule.
|Decent, still better than 2|
November 12th, 2007 [9:00:34]
murphyslaw: It had some cool scenes, a decent twist, and was definately better than Saw II.