As promised, Marvel has now unveiled the official version of the new (and possibly final) trailer for "Iron Man 3," giving us a look at Tony Stark's massive army, which also includes the Hulkbuster suit. Check out the trailer below.
Plot: "Iron Man 3" pits brash-but-brilliant industrialist Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr) against an enemy whose reach knows no bounds. When Stark finds his personal world destroyed at his enemy's hands, he embarks on a harrowing quest to find those responsible. This journey, at every turn, will test his mettle. With his back against the wall, Stark is left to survive by his own devices, relying on his ingenuity and instincts to protect those closest to him. As he fights his way back, Stark discovers the answer to the question that has secretly haunted him: does the man make the suit or does the suit make the man?
The new movie is directed by Shane Black and is set to hit theaters on May 3rd.
The cost of the suits Mark II thru Mark VII (since Mark I was free) averaged around $225 million each. Now that Tony wears the Mark 47 suit, he must have spent about $10,342,000,000 just on all those suits alone. So much cheaper being Batman.
thelazybumwrites: on March 5th, 2013 at 1:44:39 PM
"The cost of the suits Mark II thru Mark VII (since Mark I was free) averaged around $225 million each"
Depends. Much of the money that went in the first suit was R and D, manufacturing of molds, and so on. Thereafter, for example Mark III, would have been an evolutionary jump instead of reinventing the wheel. And so on. Mark V would have been but an evolution of the Mark IV suit. Et cetera. That's how it works in the real world.
That, and mass manufacturing, brings the costs of a product down. Like those 20,000 UHD televisions. Soon they'll be 500 bucks at Walmart and no one will even bat an eye when buying one. That iPhone you probably have would cost a billion dollars to make back in 1982. Now Apple's giving them away for free with a contract.
Not sure where you got the 225 million either. Tony's a genius, so in his case, he had to pay for only the materials anyway.
Maybe there's some serious quantities of palladium, tantalum and titanium in those suits...
BlackDahliawrites: on March 5th, 2013 at 8:28:40 PM
Looks f*cking awesome. So much better than the second.
Also, "So much cheaper being batman"
But if you had the money, who would you rather be?
Batman with the voice of Lindsay Lohan choking on Charlie Sheens c*ck... And the awesome tumbler.
OR
Iron Man, with Gwenyth Paltrow and suits that are a f*ck load more fun.
BlackDahliawrites: on March 5th, 2013 at 8:28:59 PM
Kate - I was thinking the same thing. Its like he thought that because Bane had a weird voice he had to have a weird voice too. Or maybe they did it so that he wouldn't have a specific accent that attached him to any particular culture.
I guess its standard in an original trilogy to have the hero quit for like 40min of the movie
KATE
Tia Carrere saw Dolph Lundgren coming in Showdown in Little Tokyo
BlackDynamitewrites: on March 5th, 2013 at 11:05:52 PM
The trailer really picked up in the second half, I'm curious to see just how large of a role Cheadle plays in this one, and the trailers play a much darker tone for Iron Man 3, than as was in the first 2.
That Hulkbuster armor at the end still looks lame to me.
2Legit2Quitwrites: on March 5th, 2013 at 11:24:18 PM
What's with all the multiple teasers, trailers and pics. Just show the damn movie already!
