WorstPreviews.com Logo Join the community [Login / Register]
Follow WorstPreviews.com on Twitter
What\ News Coming Soon In Theaters On DVD Trailer,Posters,Pictures,Wallpapers, Screensavers PeliBlog.com Trivia/Quizzes
News/Headlines
Trailer for "Midnight Special" Sci-Fi Film, with Michael Shannon and Joel Edgerton
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for "Central Intelligence" Comedy, with Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for Melissa McCarthy's "The Boss" Comedy
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for Juan Antonio Bayona's "A Monster Calls"
Nov 23rd, 2015
First Look at "Central Intelligence" Comedy, with Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for "Zoolander 2" Arrives Online
Nov 19th, 2015
Official Trailer for "Now You See Me" Sequel
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for Chris Hemsworth's "The Huntsman: Winter's War"
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for Keanu Reeves' "Exposed" Thriller
Nov 19th, 2015
First Look at Chris Pine on "Wonder Woman" Set
Nov 16th, 2015
Ridley Scott Reveals Another Title for "Prometheus" Sequel
Nov 16th, 2015
Gerard Butler is a God in "Gods of Egypt" Posters
Nov 16th, 2015
First Look at Liam Neeson in Martin Scorsese's "Silence"
Nov 16th, 2015
New Trailer for "The Divergent Series: Allegiant"
Nov 16th, 2015
Trailer for "Moonwalkers" Comedy, with Ron Perlman and Rupert Grint
Nov 16th, 2015
Trailer for Charlie Kaufman's "Anomalisa" Stop-Motion Film
Nov 3rd, 2015
Poster for "Warcraft" Arrives Online, Trailer Coming on Friday
Nov 3rd, 2015
There's a Good Reason Why Luke Skywalker Isn't on "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Poster
Nov 2nd, 2015
First Trailer for Sacha Baron Cohen's "The Brothers Grimsby" Comedy
Nov 2nd, 2015
"Spectre" Breaks Box Office Records Overseas
Nov 2nd, 2015
Final Trailer for Ron Howard's "In the Heart of the Sea," with Chris Hemsworth
Nov 2nd, 2015
New Photos From "Warcraft" Video Game Movie
Nov 2nd, 2015
Lots of New Photos From "Suicide Squad"
Oct 30th, 2015
Trailer for "Dirty Grandpa" Comedy, with Robert De Niro and Zac Efron
Oct 30th, 2015
Sandra Bullock to Star in Female Version of "Ocean's Eleven"
Oct 30th, 2015
Trailer for Jared Hess' "Don Verdean" Comedy, with Sam Rockwell
Oct 30th, 2015
"Indiana Jones" Producer Says Harrison Ford Will Not Be Recast
Oct 28th, 2015
Trailer for Adam Sandler's "The Ridiculous 6" Comedy
Oct 28th, 2015
"The Walking Dead" Fan Kills Friend Who Turned Into a Zombie
Oct 28th, 2015
Another "Monopoly" Movie in the Works
Oct 28th, 2015
"Jumanji" Remake Hires "Con Air" Writer
Oct 26th, 2015
Disney's "Tower of Terror" Park Ride Movie Moving Forward
Oct 26th, 2015
Johnny Depp and Edgar Wright Team for "Fortunately, the Milk"
Oct 26th, 2015
Previous News Stories Next News Stories

Arnold Schwarzenegger Says New "Conan" Film Will Happen Soon, Plus "Terminator 5" Details

Posted: October 13th, 2012 by WorstPreviews.com Staff
Arnold Schwarzenegger Says New "Conan" Film Will Happen Soon, Plus "Terminator 5" DetailsSubmit Comment
Back when Arnold Schwarzenegger was just returning to acting, he said that he would love to revisit some of his most popular movies, including "Terminator," "Conan," "Twins," "True Lies," and many others. But despite the fact that he has several projects in the works, none of them are related to any of his old work.

But during his book promotion, Schwarzenegger gave a quick update on a new "Conan" installment. Translated from French: "We've already had discussion about this, because it's a project that is particularly dear to me. I must first shoot 'Ten' with David Ayer, but then we're going to focus on 'Conan.' It remains to be seen who will direct and if John Milius (Conan the Barbarian) will write the script."

Meanwhile, DenOfGeek has learned that Schwarzenegger and director Justin Lin (Fast Five) have been working on a story for "Terminator 5" that will take place in an alternate timeline in which Sarah Connor and Kyle Reese are both alive. There were rumors that the film may show the war with the machines.

Source: DenOfGeek, Mad-Movies, JoBlo


Bookmark and Share
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Displaying 93 comment(s) Profanity: Turn On
bandolero999 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 7:51:00 AM

Please do Conan
Avirex writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 8:01:44 AM

Should have stayed retired.
Rambo writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 8:07:43 AM

he's too old for leading action movies,he should be used as a side kick and let someone else lead..
boogiel writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 8:31:50 AM

Probably will make an appearance as a quick cameo.
rocketman writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:26:21 AM

FFFFFUUUUUCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKK

*Grrrrrrrowlllllll.....grunt....fap.....urghhhh....tug.....atomic-fistpump.....rarghhhhhh......kerplunk....KABOOM...splosh*
Phew.

King Conan with Milus and Arnie are what dreams are made off.Please make it so movie Gods.
rocketman writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:28:35 AM

Conan reminiscing,lots of flashbacks and a new younger Conan to do the action.As long as it's more Barbarian than Destroyer it could be f*cking epic.
BadChadB33 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:37:38 AM

King Conan yes, but the T5 idea is utter sh*t.
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:55:27 AM

The side effects from all the steroids he took in the 70's are quite obvious when he comes up with this kind of ideas. In The Expendables 2 you could clearly see how slow he was moving.

@Trailer: Mate, I read the review of Skyfall and the critics are unanimous: it's one of the best Bond film ever made! Yep, that's how good it is. The Times gave a full 5 stars saying "it's a great British bulldog of a movie". Those 13 days are so bloody too long.
rocketman writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:06:10 AM

Telegraph gave it a 4/5 Den of Geek said it was brill with the odd niggle...
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:18:10 AM

@Rocket: I'll trust The Times on this one but one thing is certain: it will break at the box office.
rocketman writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:27:01 AM

Cool,is it online?
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:36:27 AM

Yes it is but it's not free: 50 quid a year.
Mr. Blonde writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:41:24 AM

@McQueen - great news about Skyfall. Totally looking forward to a badass Bond film as there is nothing on the immediate horizon worth watching. Btw, good to see you changed your avatar back to something more familar.

On Arnie, he could only play an older King Conan who is sitting on the throne ready to pass on the title. If it's Mamoa, the only thing Arnie will pass onto him is crap crusted toilet paper.
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:51:58 AM

@Mr. Blonde: you're right my friend, there isn't much to look forward at the moment.

Funny, I said the same thing to myself about my avatar. Thanks mate.
Rambo writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 12:05:38 PM

http://www.totalfilm.com/reviews/cinema/skyfall
BadChadB33 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 12:40:40 PM

Bullit- Thanks for the update bro, that wet's my panties big time now.
Electro Rock writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 12:59:23 PM

Did I just read this? Seriously? How? How can he play Conan now? His physique just isn't what it used to be. He couldn't possibly be serious. The chances of it being on point with Barbarian and less corny as Destroyer would be a feat. No Basil P for a new score either. Its difficult being hopeful about this. Love the guy, but hasnt his Conan ship sailed?
Rambo writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 1:14:26 PM

Basil P. 'Conan the Barbarian' soundtrack is one of the best ever made.
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 1:27:10 PM

@Bad: Lol!

@Rambo: absolutely. There aren't that many out there, that's for sure.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 1:32:36 PM

I like the Terminator 5 idea, but here's a better idea. Learn to ape Cameron, and make a movie that's spun off the second, which ignores he third and fourth, or in other words, make the Terminator 3 Cameron would have made.
Tanman32123 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 2:36:50 PM

Meh I'd watch the T5 probably.. Also his 2 upcoming moves don't look or sound to bad, so I'll most likely be watching those as well lol
trailertrash writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 3:12:02 PM

Bullit

Great news mate !! Seriously I can't wait for that movie, 13 days !!! I'd like those days to c*m quicker than me in a 3 way with Mila Kunis and Cobie Smulder, lol
trailertrash writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 3:13:01 PM

Cheers for the link Rambo

Nothing from Empire yet, They are always a pretty good gauge i normally agree with most of their reviewers.
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 3:13:52 PM

^ ^ LOL! that's the British spirit but I can't say the same with my woman... Lol!
McQueen writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 3:14:41 PM

*meant on your 1st post naturally.
pornfly writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 4:47:15 PM

Conans wife catches him sleeping with the maid so he kills her
HAIL KING CONAN

Now less talkie more workie
pornfly writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 4:52:54 PM

f*ck YOU GUYS
I JUST WANNA WAKE UP AND SEE SKYFALL ALREADY
Theyr doing a Bond retrospective on 60minutes sunday
Stapes writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:10:45 PM

First off, if John Milius is in then I'm interested, second, f*ck Terminator 5, however they manage to work Arnie's old ass in there it's sure to make the movie suck, and third, Terminator 2 is good for nostalgic reasons only, Terminator 3 was far superior in every way that it could be minus Sarah Connor. The older and smarter I get, the more I see that Cameron hit his peak with Aliens. Everything else he's done earned well, but is forgotten and seldom rewatched cause it's high priced dressed up crap.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:25:38 PM

"Terminator 2 is good for nostalgic reasons only, Terminator 3 was far superior in every way that it could be minus Sarah Connor."

lmao. Stupid Stapes be trollin'.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:28:46 PM

Stapes the Stupid must have written this article

http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2004/10/terminator/

For the non-f*cking-morons (anyone other than Stapes)

http://whatculture.com/film/50-reasons-why-terminator-2-is-the-greatest-film-of-all-time.php
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:33:42 PM

Hi, my name is Stapes, and I say stupid sh*t so other people will notice me because otherwise getting a big black d*ck in my ass is the only way anyone knows I'm alive.
pornfly writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:54:01 PM

I was gonna warn you STAPES but im bored
swoooop writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 5:57:07 PM

Arnold Schwarzenegger is kind of dead to me. Have no interest of seeing this old man taking up his gun and becoming an action hero again. If he is thinking about returning to a Conan film, I hope his job will be something like dolly grip or something. Yeah, that sounds about right.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:04:46 PM

"I hope his job will be something like dolly grip."

At his age, more like PoliGrip.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:22:00 PM

"The older and smarter I get"

Yeah but it's too bad your age and IQ are the same number, right?
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:32:16 PM

Terminator 3 sucks d*ck. Nick Stahl sucks d*ck. Jonathan Mostow sucks d*ck. Claire Danes eats p*ssy and wouldnít know how to suck d*ck if it was thrown in her face.

Terminator 3 is a movie for faggots to enjoy. f*cking pathetic.

minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:33:36 PM

Either youíre not a Terminator fan, or youíve been smoking something. Either way, no one with an ounce of sense would be able to say T3 is better then T2. T3 is cartoon parody of T2, and itís special effects are equally cartoonish. I watch T2 and T3 and I truly to believe the T-1000 special effect are way more impressive then anything in T3, despite their being a 15 year gap between the two. Thatís just one example of how BAD T3 is.

Oh, and BTW, Furlong is the definitive John Connor, not that p*ssy Nick Stahl.
swoooop writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:46:48 PM

"Terminator 3 is a movie for faggots to enjoy. f*cking pathetic"

The correct term is Homosexual, or gay, and since you recommend it to the homosexual, I will recommend it to a gay friend of mine.

If you know any other movies that gay people might like, feel free to mention it. You seam to know a lot about it.
Rambo writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:57:39 PM

terminator 3 was sh*t...a pale replica of terminator 2
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 6:59:36 PM

"The correct term is Homosexual, or gay,"

The "correct" term is whatever I f*cking say it is and I sure as f*ck don't need some old c*cksucker correcting me, although I can see how you might favor that particular fantasy.

"and since you recommend it to the homosexual, I will recommend it to a gay friend of mine."

Recommend him to stop sucking d*ck. That's the best recommendation I can give. Tell him to eat some p*ssy. Who knows, he might actually like it. Hell, lie. Tell him it tastes like a man's ass.

"If you know any other movies that gay people might like, feel free to mention it."

Sure. Philadelphia. That's what being queer gets you. AIDS and looking like Tom Hanks. That just might scare him 'straight'.

"You seam to know a lot about it"

The word is seem, not seam, although in your "I'm not gay but my boyfriend is" case, 'semen' might be more apropos.
pornfly writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 7:36:38 PM

boredom gone
bandolero999 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 8:03:22 PM

Tell me you're joking about T3 being superior than T2 RIGHT?

especially nick stahl
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 8:59:24 PM

Stapes isn't joking. He's f*cking trollin'.

Little pretentious c*ckknocker.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 9:26:39 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skC6qUBUdjA

Cinema Disasters: Terminator 3 Review (part 1 of 5)
Ranger writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 9:36:40 PM

I guess that bastard kid of his is eating like a teenager, so Arnie needs the grocery money.

I think he just missed being in films, a lot.

If he does do Conan, I hope Mila Kunis is in it and there's a graphic rape scene.



Again, I don't condone 'rape'... just saying (in this case) it could help the movie, art-wise.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:08:14 PM

Know what I'm watching right now?

Terminator 2.

Know what I'm NOT watching right now?

Terminator 3.

f*ck you, Stapes.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:13:31 PM

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stapes

Irish slang for a depressed, obsessive, psychotic, stalkerish, attention seeking girl.


"See her? She's the girl who was stalking Jamie and Stephen!"


"Oh my God, Chloe? Yeah, that girl is such a Stapes.
minkowski writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:30:31 PM

In other news, Casey Anthony sued for 3 Billion.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/13/casey-anthony-sued-for-3-billion-naomi-riches-threatened-to-kill-her_n_1963688.html

That's dollars by the way, not pesos.

Hell, even I have 3 billion pesos.
OneTime writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 10:35:56 PM

ive been saying this for years.
bandolero999 writes:
on October 13th, 2012 at 11:56:54 PM

Don't forget to mention terminator salvation as well
pornfly writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 1:35:46 AM

I dont have cable so you know what i'm watchn?
T3

damn Public Access
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 4:13:09 AM

Warn me, Porn? of what? Little bitch mink getting his panties in a wad over my denegration of the juevenile T2? No warning necessary. And you're the only nitwit still watching T2 Mink.

My issue with T2, I liked it when I was like 12 or 13, now I don't, cause it's immature and retarded. Its only value is for nostalgia at this point.

The T1000 is the stupidest concept ever to be shat out on film. It's a product of Cameron using the newly discovered morphing technology at the time and trying to figure out how he could use it in his new movie, liquid metal! An AI that consists entirely of liquid metal that reforms itself blah blah blah... Cameron abandoned science completely and entered the realm of magic with that stupid creation, and who bought it? Well, 12 year olds and idiots with that level of mentality (Mink).
Tanman32123 writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 4:25:21 AM

f*ck off stapes, T2 is an awesome flick, and lmao mink snapped
swoooop writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 5:55:35 AM

@mink

Ohh, I love it when you get upsett, and so does my gay friend. He want to hock up with you. He never seen a worst case of gayfabic atitude. You thinks you must live inn a sosiety where the sosial pressure really deside what values you have, so his wondering where you live...Texas??? Iran??? Where you bullid at school? Is your trollin just a revenge for that? Or is your d*ck just f*cking small.

Look d*ckhead. Your probably a cool gay...I MEEN guy. You found your little domain at WP, behind Rangers shaddow, but you have nothing really intressesting to say. Your just a damn kidd, who cant be heard anyplace else I guess. Enjoy Wp kid, and please feel free to pick this apart as well, I dont give a f*ck.
bane writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 7:30:22 AM


at exact
58 minutes 20 seconds

http://www.movie2k.to/On-the-Road-watch-movie-1969293.html

_JB_ writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 8:02:06 AM

There is only one terminator, the first one. All the others are sh*t.

Conan 3d is much better story than Arnold's one.

Look at the rediculous c*nt Bullit talking absolute sh*t!
_JB_ writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 8:04:31 AM

Swoop learn to spell u outrageous c*nt!
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 8:53:11 AM

Stapes has to be the dumbest f*cker on here.

"An AI that consists entirely of liquid metal that reforms itself blah blah blah... Cameron abandoned science completely and entered the realm of magic with that stupid creation"

You must have forgot Clarke's Third Law, idiot:

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

That's right. A nanoparticle metallic entity created by a super-intelligent AI. But you probably think 'machines' using humans for energy, in direct contradiction to the laws of thermodynamics, is 'smart'.

"And you're the only nitwit still watching T2 Mink.

And yet you admit you still watch it for nostalgia? Why? Was that the first time you had a wet dream to Robert Patrick's polyalloy mimetic d*ck, foreshadowing your days with chrome dildos?

Fact is, T2 is rated 2 points higher, on IMDb, than T3. But no one watches T2, so says the guy taking pictures and writing sh*t while his comrades are losing eyes and limbs.


"It's a product of Cameron using the newly discovered morphing technology at the time and trying to figure out how he could use it in his new movie"

OMG, James Cameron used new technology to advance movie visuals?! That BASTARD! How dare he innovate in film! Better to retread the second film in an unending series of unfunny 'comedic' gaffes and non sequiturs, because that's SMART!

"Or is your d*ck just f*cking small."

Right. And you say you're not gay yet you're curious as to the size of my d*ck?
_JB_ writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:02:07 AM

Mink that c*ck gobbler can't even spell simple words! He is beneath Bullit!! And that is saying something coming from me.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:07:54 AM

First off, I knew you'd bring up Clarke with the magic comment you predictable bitch, and it does not apply being that technology couldn't have been advanced enough to take advantage of that little loop hole trope, so I'm to believe that Skynet is so f*cking technologically advanced that they come up with magic liquid metal that can time travel (even though it isn't organic) yet still the super genius AI is dumb enough to not be able to grasp the fact that you can't change the past. Not buying it, nope, it was just Cameron being a moron and morons like you buying it.

Second: @swoooop, all gramatical atrocity aside, you are 100% correct, it doesn't take Sigmund Frued to see that anyone who mentions d*cks in asses as much as Minkowski does, isn't obviously harboring a desire to get butt f*cked.

Third: Who the f*ck are you, Tanman? That's all the response you deserve.

Bottomline, Cameron's liquid metal bullsh*t is just that, and unless you're 12 years old are a man child who still watches Tom and Jerry like Mink, you're past it.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:10:18 AM

And, Mink, don't even start on my service record you little chicken sh*t. I've been in the trenches with the troops being shot at plenty. A paltry coward such as yourself doesn't know anything about it so do yourself a favor and shut your c*ck sucking mouth.
_JB_ writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:40:55 AM

Stapes u wanna f*ck mink, just admit it
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:41:10 AM

First off, I knew you'd bring up Clarke with the magic comment you predictable bitch"

No you didn't, you sad little f*cking liar.

"and it does not apply being that technology couldn't have been advanced enough"


Because a super-intelligent AI learning in polynomial time, one that can invent time-travel, would have major, insurmountable, issues inventing a liquid metal man.

"to take advantage of that little loop hole trope"

And yet you haven't even bothered to explain how this supposed "loop hole trope" is either a loophole or a trope, or how it's not possible, according to Stapes the Scientist.

Funny thing is, all of T2 is kind of a loophole, in order for Cameron to make a second film, which shouldn't be possible, given the first, and yet you don't bother to criticize Terminator 3 for doing to same, very poorly while aping and mocking T2 (because it knew it could never surpass Cameron's masterpiece so why not go the Richard Lester route?) I might add.

Reminds me of people who forgive bad people they like and not the bad people they don't.

In other words, intellectually dishonest.

And before you open your piehole and say Terminator 3 'closed the time loop', let me add that Terminator 2 left the ending OPEN. Only in the alternate non-canon ending did he pointedly avoid the "rise of the machines".


"so I'm to believe that Skynet is so f*cking technologically advanced that they come up with magic liquid metal that can time travel (even though it isn't organic)"

It. Skynet is an it. Singular. Not a they.

And now you're just changing goal posts. Now it's about sending inorganic matter back in time, forgetting that if the T1000 can imitate CLOTH, he can imitate a covering of organic tissue, which is no different than Arnie's flesh covered endo-skeleton.

If you're going to argue, at least understand what it is you're arguing, simpleton.


"yet still the super genius AI is dumb enough to not be able to grasp the fact that you can't change the past."

Because only you're smart enough to understand how time travel works. Because time travel is a scientific concept like velocity, and obviously, it only works one way, because Stapes says so.


"Not buying it, nope, it was just Cameron being a moron and morons like you buying it."

And yet you have an avatar of a comic book character who flies, magically...





Funny thing is, Terminator 3 doesn't even make sense at it's core, pun intended.

The entire film claims Skynet is software, running on smart toasters and phones, no core, no central processor, and then it, this supposedly highly-intelligent entity, proceeds to NUKE all the cities of the world, which is exactly where it 'lives', as opposed to a farmhouse in the country.

In other words, Skynet destroys itself in order to destroy mankind.


Face it. Terminator 3 is the Superman 2 of the series and Mostow is that franchises Richard Lester.

End of f*cking story.



Makes loads of sense. If you're an idiot.


minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:41:56 AM

lol @ JB.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:47:58 AM

"I've been in the trenches with the troops"

And the troops have been in your trench.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:56:03 AM

First, the point of your predictability is mute.

Second, theoretical magical liquid metal imitating cloth, flesh, etc, doesn't mean anything because it only imitates to fool the human eye, can't fool physics, so if it's already established that you can't send the unliving back in time, then it's bullsh*t.

And third, based on the established rules of the Terminator universe, all three films work better than any other time travel movie assuming you believe the laws of common sense established in theoretical time travel. If a machine were smart enough to perform time travel, it certainly wouldn't be so stupid, after three films, the third of which shows humans realizing that you can't change the past, to continuously send machines back in time to change the present or future. If the franchise were smart and rooted in real theoretical science, it would have addressed tangent universes, but it doesn't and that's because it's just a stupid f*cking movie. So stop making an idiot of yourself in defending and making up excuses for Cameron's obvious choices which were in no way shape or form designed to continue any kind of coherent story, but rather make a stupid f*cking movie that only 12 year olds or those like yourself continue to defend.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:56:26 AM

and JB, you're a faggot, shut up.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 9:57:18 AM

"First, the point of your predictability is mute."

You mean "moot".

f*cking stooge.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:00:41 AM

who's falling back on the adhomonyms now? f*cking little bitch.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:00:44 AM

"Second, theoretical magical liquid metal imitating cloth, flesh, etc, doesn't mean anything because it only imitates to fool the human eye, can't fool physics, so if it's already established that you can't send the unliving back in time, then it's bullsh*t."

Because you were in the movie, and thus you know the T-1000 felt like metal and not flesh, his clothes felt and looked like metal and not fabric, because liquid metal clothing wouldn't upend his disguise at all, right? But you were there, right? Right Stapes? I mean, not only do you have a degree in nanotechnology, but your knowledge of what men feel like is totally unsurpassed, being "in the trenches with the troops" and all.

Then again, Terminator 3 did the very same thing with the hilariously titled Terminatrix. Durrrrr!
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:01:50 AM

"who's falling back on the adhomonyms now? f*cking little bitch."

lol, it's ad hominems.



You must have ACED the ASVAB, genius.

In a better world, you'd be cannon fodder by now.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:07:52 AM

actually, I did ace the ASVAB. And, no, I wasn't there to feel the imitation it's a movie you f*cking idiot, and works based on assumptions of what is real and what you can realistically set aside (suspend reality) to enjoy science fiction, and as I've already said, no intelligent person could make an excuse for Cameron's liquid time traveling metal, save 12 year olds or morons so stuck up their own asses and Camerons, like you, Mink. You know your argument doesn't make any sense at this point, it's just you licking sh*t off of Cameron's d*ck at this point. I don't watch movie to make excuses for obviously stupid story decisions, aparently you to though.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:09:31 AM

sh*t, booze is kicking in, time to call it a match.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:17:58 AM

"And third, based on the established rules of the Terminator universe"

I wasn't aware of any rules. Seems they were just making movies, some better than others. Where are these rules, Stapes? Or did you just dream them up? You know, like you dream up naked men in peac*ck feathers.

"all three films work better than any other time travel movie"


Right. Three films you admit play fast and loose with time travel are better than any other time-travel film. Better than Primer, better than Back to the Future, Bill and Ted, Somewhere in Time, Timerider, 12 Monkeys, Looper?




"assuming you believe the laws of common sense established in theoretical time travel."

There's some nonsensical solutions to Einstein's field equations, and some nonense with wormholes, but that's it.

Time travel is FANTASY, not science, and as such, the writers can do what the f*ck they want.



"If a machine were smart enough to perform time travel, it certainly wouldn't be so stupid, after three films, the third of which shows humans realizing that you can't change the past, to continuously send machines back in time to change the present or future."

In other words, you think the Terminator franchise is stupid, but Terminator 3 is the least stupid of them all even though it's every bit as guilty of screwing with "the rules" of time travel as Terminator 2, and does so with childish humor, yet you think it's somehow superior to Terminator 2.



Okay.



"If the franchise were smart and rooted in real theoretical science"

There's no theoretical science of time travel, idiot. You're confusing science fiction with science fact.

more, watch Doctor Who less, dullard.



"it would have addressed tangent universes"

No such thing, scientifically speaking, unless you think Donnie Dark is scientific.



"but it doesn't and that's because it's just a stupid f*cking movie."

And yet not nearly as stupid as Terminator 3, your favorite.




"So stop making an idiot of yourself in defending and making up excuses for Cameron's obvious choices which were in no way shape or form designed to continue any kind of coherent story, but rather make a stupid f*cking movie that only 12 year olds or those like yourself continue to defend."

And yet you prefer the Terminator movie with the bouncing baby toy, set to comedic sound effects, right?


minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:20:07 AM

"actually, I did ace the ASVAB"


And yet the difference between moot and mute escapes you.

Thank god we have geniuses like you keeping the world safe...
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:21:49 AM

"Read actual science more, watch Doctor Who less, dullard."


FTFM.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:23:51 AM

And Stapes...common sense in theoretical physics? lol. Like the common sense in quantum mechanics? Because time travel is not only theoretically possible, but it also obeys human common sense.

Just admit it. You know nothing of actual f*cking science, so spare me your ignorant delusions.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:25:54 AM

First, I never said T3 was the best, Terminator is, second, from the point of established time travel rules, and yes, there are theoretical rules for the idea of time travel, T3 does it far better, all T2 is is a Bay film overrated by Cameron worshippers. T3 is far superior to T2, whether you acknowledge it or not.
swoooop writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:28:14 AM

@mink

By the way, thanx for being my personal spellchecker bitch. Im loving it.
And if I where gay, i wouldt have any problem admirting that to a insecure litte boy as you.

(Please check for spelling errors little boy).
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:30:04 AM

"there are theoretical rules for the idea of time travel"

lol, no, no there's not, simpleton.

As I said, there's a couple of solutions to Einstein's field equations, which are nonsensical, involving infinite rotating cylinders and such, and there's some sh*t with wormholes with mouths that move relativistically, but that's it, and in NEITHER case can you go back in time before the machine was built, and both involve impossible conditions.

Time travel is FANTASY, not science.

You simply have no idea what the f*ck you're saying. Idiot.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:31:47 AM

"And if I where gay, i wouldt have any problem admirting that to a insecure litte boy as you."

You're gay without actually having sex with men, which is even worse, because at least then "the homosexuals" have an excuse, be it biology or choice, but you're just a d*ckless loser against your own will, apparently.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:33:44 AM

"from the point of established time travel rules"

Where are these RULES, Stapes? You keep talking about time travel rules, but there are NONE. There are no scientific principles for time travel, because time travel is fantasy.

You're simply regurgitating what you've been told from other films and illiterately confusing it with science, of which you obviously know nothing.
_JB_ writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:36:58 AM

Me a faggot??? f*ck you boytoy!!! Igwt a got babe tinning my *sshole weekly, unlike YOU getting your *sshole jammed full of hard black c*ck you c*m gurgling WHORE
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:37:01 AM

"T3 is far superior to T2, whether you acknowledge it or not."

That's your opinion, Stoops, but not only does it contravene the overwhelming opinion of the masses, the critics and even the people involved in making films, it contravenes whatever objective guides there are for comparing one work of art to another, and yes, there are rules and guides, or else my sh*t doodles would be just as good as a peak Caravaggio, but that's kind of where your thinking is, comparing Terminator 3 to 2.
Stapes writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:38:26 AM

That's bullsh*t, Mink, in the quantum universe particles travel back in time and coexist on different times. The only thing that's bullsh*t about Terminator's time travel is the idea that an super intelligent AI wouldn't be able to understand that you couldn't change the past unless you either A: created a tangent universe, or B: time travel had been invented prior to sending back the Terminator. Keep defending plot holes, I'm sure that theoretical money from Cameron will enter your account at any second.... Moron.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:41:41 AM

"That's bullsh*t, Mink, in the quantum universe particles travel back in time and coexist on different times."

LOL! Yeah okay, not sure if that was an epically brilliant troll or just the ruminations of a five year-old watching way, way too much Quantum Leap.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:45:22 AM

"The only thing that's bullsh*t about Terminator's time travel is the idea that an super intelligent AI wouldn't be able to understand that you couldn't change the past unless you either A: created a tangent universe, or B: time travel had been invented prior to sending back the Terminator."

It's a movie, moron. It's not a treatise on the revolutions of the planets. Time travel is fantasy. Because it's fantasy, the writers can do what they want. It's not like some scientist can go out and replicate the film's premise to test it for scientific literacy.

For all YOU know, which is really very little, the past is constantly changing. How would you know anyway?
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:47:26 AM

And there's no such thing as a 'tangent' universe.

That's bullsh*t that was invented for that awesomely bullsh*t movie Donnie Darko, based ignorantly on the concept of mathematical tangent spaces, which Richard Kelly obviously didn't f*cking understand, and here you are, not understanding Richard Kelly's stupidity.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 10:49:56 AM

"in the quantum universe particles travel back in time and coexist on different times."

I'm still SMFH over this one...

Wow. Just...wow. Public education at it's finest, I guess.
triggax writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 2:02:43 PM

"Terminator 2 is good for nostalgic reasons only, Terminator 3 was far superior in every way that it could be minus Sarah Connor. The older and smarter I get, the more I see that Cameron hit his peak with Aliens"

This has to be the dumbest f*cking thing I've ever read on WP.

Mink, Mostow does not suck. He just gets the bottom of the barrel studio projects too often.

I can't believe this Stapes character. My head is rattled. I've never in my life heard someone actually flat out say the 3rd was a better movie. Although I don't judge for peoples preference, there's a difference between personal taste and plain f*cking stupidity.

Seriously can't believe that.. So Cameron basically sucked after Aliens you say? So the 3 time oscar winning highest grossing director of all time has made 2 good movies in your opinion? Youre f*cking dumb. It's a good thing that we have Jonathan Mostow to pick up James Camerons slack.
minkowski writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 2:35:41 PM

"Mink, Mostow does not suck. He just gets the bottom of the barrel studio projects too often."

Okay. Fair enough.

He *virtually* sucks.
Tanman32123 writes:
on October 14th, 2012 at 11:38:17 PM

"lol @ JB"

"Is this real life?"
you just lol'd a JB! that's against the WP Book of rules and regulations mink!

And damn, i haven't seen a good 100 comment Troll off in awhile!

Cheers boys! :)
minkowski writes:
on October 15th, 2012 at 8:54:18 AM

^^^JB's a troll, but he means about as little harm, or less, than some of the other people on here not normally associated with trolldom.

There's a Good Reason Why Luke Skywalker Isn't on "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Poster

"The Walking Dead" Fan Kills Friend Who Turned Into a Zombie

"Indiana Jones" Producer Says Harrison Ford Will Not Be Recast

Ridley Scott Reveals Another Title for "Prometheus" Sequel

Johnny Depp and Edgar Wright Team for "Fortunately, the Milk"

"Spectre" Breaks Box Office Records Overseas

"Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Demolishes Pre-Sale Records

Paul Bettany Responds to Jason Statham's "Avengers" Insult

Daniel Craig Would Rather Commit Suicide Than Return as James Bond

Marvel Has Contingency Plans In Case It Regains Rights to Superheroes
Lace Wedding Dresses from ViViDress UK online shop, buy with confidence and cheap price.
WorstPreviews.com hosted by pair Networks WorstPreviews.com
Hosted by pair Networks
News Feeds | Box Office | Movie Reviews | Buzz: Top 100 | Popularity: Top 100
Poster Store | About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Web Tools | Site Map
Copyright © 2009 WorstPreviews.com. All rights reserved