WorstPreviews.com Logo Join the community [Login / Register]
Follow WorstPreviews.com on Twitter
What\ News Coming Soon In Theaters On DVD Trailer,Posters,Pictures,Wallpapers, Screensavers PeliBlog.com Trivia/Quizzes
News/Headlines
Trailer for "Midnight Special" Sci-Fi Film, with Michael Shannon and Joel Edgerton
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for "Central Intelligence" Comedy, with Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for Melissa McCarthy's "The Boss" Comedy
Nov 23rd, 2015
Trailer for Juan Antonio Bayona's "A Monster Calls"
Nov 23rd, 2015
First Look at "Central Intelligence" Comedy, with Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for "Zoolander 2" Arrives Online
Nov 19th, 2015
Official Trailer for "Now You See Me" Sequel
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for Chris Hemsworth's "The Huntsman: Winter's War"
Nov 19th, 2015
Trailer for Keanu Reeves' "Exposed" Thriller
Nov 19th, 2015
First Look at Chris Pine on "Wonder Woman" Set
Nov 16th, 2015
Ridley Scott Reveals Another Title for "Prometheus" Sequel
Nov 16th, 2015
Gerard Butler is a God in "Gods of Egypt" Posters
Nov 16th, 2015
First Look at Liam Neeson in Martin Scorsese's "Silence"
Nov 16th, 2015
New Trailer for "The Divergent Series: Allegiant"
Nov 16th, 2015
Trailer for "Moonwalkers" Comedy, with Ron Perlman and Rupert Grint
Nov 16th, 2015
Trailer for Charlie Kaufman's "Anomalisa" Stop-Motion Film
Nov 3rd, 2015
Poster for "Warcraft" Arrives Online, Trailer Coming on Friday
Nov 3rd, 2015
There's a Good Reason Why Luke Skywalker Isn't on "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Poster
Nov 2nd, 2015
First Trailer for Sacha Baron Cohen's "The Brothers Grimsby" Comedy
Nov 2nd, 2015
"Spectre" Breaks Box Office Records Overseas
Nov 2nd, 2015
Final Trailer for Ron Howard's "In the Heart of the Sea," with Chris Hemsworth
Nov 2nd, 2015
New Photos From "Warcraft" Video Game Movie
Nov 2nd, 2015
Lots of New Photos From "Suicide Squad"
Oct 30th, 2015
Trailer for "Dirty Grandpa" Comedy, with Robert De Niro and Zac Efron
Oct 30th, 2015
Sandra Bullock to Star in Female Version of "Ocean's Eleven"
Oct 30th, 2015
Trailer for Jared Hess' "Don Verdean" Comedy, with Sam Rockwell
Oct 30th, 2015
"Indiana Jones" Producer Says Harrison Ford Will Not Be Recast
Oct 28th, 2015
Trailer for Adam Sandler's "The Ridiculous 6" Comedy
Oct 28th, 2015
"The Walking Dead" Fan Kills Friend Who Turned Into a Zombie
Oct 28th, 2015
Another "Monopoly" Movie in the Works
Oct 28th, 2015
"Jumanji" Remake Hires "Con Air" Writer
Oct 26th, 2015
Disney's "Tower of Terror" Park Ride Movie Moving Forward
Oct 26th, 2015
Johnny Depp and Edgar Wright Team for "Fortunately, the Milk"
Oct 26th, 2015
Previous News Stories Next News Stories

"Avatar" Tickets are Already On Sale

Posted: August 27th, 2009 by WorstPreviews.com Staff
"Avatar" Tickets are Already On SaleSubmit Comment
James Cameron's "Avatar" is set to hit theaters on December 18th, but AMC has already decided to sell tickets to the movie's opening-day midnight screenings.

On Friday, online ticketers MovieTickets.com and Fandango began ringing up sales of "Avatar" performances at more than 75 AMC locations, most of them IMAX 3D venues. Sales of the midnight tickets have been said to be "healthy."

"Tickets being put on sale for a film four months in advance is unheard of," MovieTickets executive vp Joel Cohen said. "The fact that tickets have already been sold really speaks to the tremendous buzz the film has already created and the power of James Cameron at the box office."

"Audiences are hungry for fresh fare with original storytelling," Fandango spokesman Harry Medved said. "And with 'Avatar,' you have no idea where the story is going to go."

At this point, no one can offer anything but tickets for the first midnight screenings, as nobody knows what the final running time will be once Cameron finishes editing "Avatar." It is assumed that it will be between 2 1/2 and 3 hours.

Click here to read more about "Avatar."

Source: THR


Bookmark and Share
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Displaying 56 comment(s) Profanity: Turn On
minkowski writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 6:34:45 AM

A little presumptuous, aren't they?
TRUEMAN writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 8:49:15 AM

i think i will see the movie online for free or perhaps i will buy in CD from guy who sell movies on my street!
Forrest75 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:30:15 AM

I'm already in line at my local AMC.

I beat you all!
TheHerpesOnRangersDick writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:34:17 AM

Delgo + Big Fat Blunt = Avatar in 3D
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:51:21 AM

Good thing I'm not planning on seeing it at midnight cause I so don't have the money right now lol.
WeThePeople writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:40:50 AM

Original storytelling? It looks like a conventional narrative, but Medved knows as much as I do ... sh*t!

If people were hungry for original storytelling they would be devouring Finnegans Wake and not Hollywood's c*ck.
lost_addict writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 12:07:24 PM

Hitler learns that the Avatar trailer sucks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPyipuT-Jg
lost_addict writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 12:21:14 PM

p.s

is that photo for men with cartoon alien homo foot fetish?
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 1:50:39 PM

"It is assumed that it will be between 2 1/2 and 3 hours."

It can't be past 2 hours and 42 minutes, because that's the maximum length that Imax projectors can hold.

"Tickets being put on sale for a film four months in advance is unheard of,"

Especially for such a lackluster looking movie.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 1:52:11 PM

"Audiences are hungry for fresh fare with original storytelling,"

Yea! That's why Watchmen flopped! And Transformers made almost more money than titanic, because audiences are just hungry, hungry hippo(crite)s for "Original Storytelling"!
Scrooge McDuck writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 2:33:21 PM

To be fair, Spooky, Watchmen was a remake and Transformers 2 was an original script. However, this movie does look like teh ballsack.
Scrooge McDuck writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 2:34:09 PM

By remake I mean adaptation of the comic***
minkowski writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 2:37:48 PM

I thought Transformers 2 was/is a remake of Transformers 1?
Scrooge McDuck writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 2:49:40 PM

No Transformers 2 was completely original trash. Terminator Salvation was a remake of Transformers 1 with a little Dark Knight voice thrown in. I understand the confusion though.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 5:04:37 PM

Watchmen flopped because it was a sh*tty adaptation of a story too vast for the film medium and too complex for the mind of a glorified set and costume designer named Zack Snyder. The marketing was also trash.
chiefone writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 5:44:13 PM

"And Transformers made almost more money than titanic"

Spooky are you retarted? Not trying to wind you up, truely a legitimate question. You can tell me the truth, I won't hold it against you.

Reason why I ask. For you to make a statement like that I think shows your lack of the ability to think things through before you say sh*t When on earth did Tranformers 2 almost make more money than Titanic??

1. Titanic (1997) $600,779,824
2. The Dark Knight (2008) $533,316,061
3. Star Wars (1977) $460,935,665
4. Shrek 2 (2004) $436,471,036
5. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) $434,949,459
6. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $431,065,444
7. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) $423,032,628
8. Spider-Man (2002) $403,706,375
9. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009) $398,441,218
10. Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) $380,262,555
chiefone writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 5:46:36 PM

and sorry its retarded, not retarted, not that you would even know the difference
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 6:53:04 PM

Yeah it's not even in the same f*cking ball park lol especially when you tally worldwide sales.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 9:05:57 PM

"retarted"

Retarded*. And no, I'm not.

Who cares if I there were like 8 movies before TF2, why so technical? Crybaby.

My point is that people like cheap, simple, mind numbing entertainment, and dolts like you seem to eat it up.

"1. Titanic (1997) $600,779,824"
It was O.K, If you think TDK is over rated then don't you dare say this wasn't.
"2. The Dark Knight (2008) $533,316,061"
Over rated. Ledgers death fueled the fire.
"3. Star Wars (1977) $460,935,665"
Should be number 1. I love this movie.
"4. Shrek 2 (2004) $436,471,036"
Starting to see my point?
"5. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) $434,949,459"
Considering it's number 5, that's severly under rated. Should be number 2...
"6. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $431,065,444"
If you think this was, by any means, a good movie, then get the f*ck out of WorstPreviews and break your computer.
"7. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) $423,032,628"
Meh.
"8. Spider-Man (2002) $403,706,375"
Definitely did not deserve that much money, but I liked it.
"9. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009) $398,441,218"
See this? THIS is number 9. Think about that.
"10. Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) $380,262,555 "
And you see this? THIS is number 10. Think about THIS too.

I don't think that showing me this list helped your argument at all.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 9:08:18 PM

"Watchmen flopped because it was a sh*tty adaptation of a story too vast for the film medium and too complex for the mind of a glorified set and costume designer named Zack Snyder."

He did a better job than anyone else would have.

Everyone had their own f*cking novel that they used as a goddamn script, that's pretty f*cking faithful.

Besides, I don't think you've even had a copy long enough in your possesion to understand the tones of it, just thought "OH HAI WATCHMAN IS c*mMIN OUT BETTER REED IT", then skimmed through it and watched the movie, and said "LOL IT SUCKS CUZ I DUNNO Y" and then proceeded to j*zz all over your copy of The Dark Knight.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:41:02 PM

I don't give a f*ck if they had Alan Moore sitting next to them when they wrote the script the film is more about astehtics than the story and Zack Snyder believes that just because he includes a bunch of pop culture references and shows Nixon in the War Room that his film is important. No its not you f*cking fanboy. Comic panels on 35mm does not equal a good adaptation and the words faithful and good should not be confused as the same thing.

Paul Greengrass and Terry Giliam both would have made a better Watchmen than that idiot Snyder. They're BETTER directors and if you believe they aren't you're a f*cking idiot plain and simple. Watchmen was a sh*t film, the only character that felt fully fleshed was Rorsasch and that certainly isn't the case in the comic. I think they should have let Hayter just go along with his original idea. That would have been more interesting than what ended up being released.
Scrooge McDuck writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:44:26 PM

Oh how I love arguments regarded films that have nothing to do with anything. I'll end this right now. Watchmen was meh, and there's no way to know that Snyder did the "best" job and no one could have done better, no way to know. With that said, if Paul Greengrass directed it I probably would have thrown up while watching it since in all his movies the camera is manned by a three year old fat kid with parkinson's.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:48:16 PM

By the way just cause you think something is over rated doesn't mean it didn't deserve the money it garnished at the B.O. Most of those films are well received besides Transformers 2 which is absolute sh*t in all the categories necessary to make a great film. And his list did help his argument which proved you were completely bonkers with your it almost beat Titanic claim lol.
minkowski writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:56:34 PM

"Original storytelling? It looks like a conventional narrative, but Medved knows as much as I do ... sh*t!"

Neither of you have read the scrptment, then.

"If people were hungry for original storytelling they would be devouring Finnegans Wake and not Hollywood's c*ck."

I'm pretty sure, if literary critics cannot ascertain the nature of FW's plot, no sreenwriter that's ever lived, or ever will, can or will make a film from that book. FW was an avant garde literary experiment, and a hefty one at that. Translating it to the screen would either require a grueling ten hour film that everyone would despise, or a FW film in title only.

SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:06:09 PM

TGDirector, who is an infinitely better poster, and human being than " TH3D4RKKN1GH7" will ever be, loved watchmen, and hasn't read the graphic novel.

"No its not you f*cking fanboy."

Ironic, isn't it?
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:09:14 PM

"By the way just cause you think something is over rated"

Look at where it stands in highest grossing movies of all time, then watch the film back to back with anything kubrick has made or anything cameron has made.

Then I DARE you to tell me TDK isn't over rated.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:11:12 PM

"And his list did help his argument"

Will you explain how in his defense as I explained how it didn't in my offense?

"which proved you were completely bonkers with your it almost beat Titanic claim lol."

Oh, of course not, because that's what someone with common sense who isn't a fanboy would do.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:15:11 PM

So, you have the nuts, TDK, to tell me out of the millions upon million million million films out there, that I my claim that out of all these films, that just because there was a difference of 8 movies, that my claim is rendered void?

LOL
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:18:16 PM

I guess people are willing to forget large numbers and statistics to support their claims.

Like Mink accidentally forgetting the 50 million uninsured, or TDK forgetting that there are more than likely over a billion movies out there, or any Christian saying a 3000 year old fairy tale is greater than science.
Scrooge McDuck writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:36:04 PM

Shhhhhhhh
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:39:47 PM

Your rebuttal doesn't change the fact that you stated the film almost made more money than Titanic lol. The other things you added after he posted the list is a mere way of trying to cover up the nonsense of that claim. Secondly my comment on your thoughts of the film weren't targeted at your claims of TDK is over rated specifically it was a general attack on your entire list analysis.

I don't know who TGDirector is nor do I care really and you don't know me at all so your remarks on my character are unnecessary and pointless. The rest of your post are nothing but useless babble so if you'd like to respond to my post in a more clear and concise manor I'd be willing to entertain you.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:40:39 PM

By the way if you adjust for inflation Star Wars ranks number 2 on the top list, Titanic is Six. Number 1? Gone with the Wind.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:45:39 PM

The bigger argument here is that you believe film quality should equate how well a film does at the box office and while that's a nice idealistic view on the matter, it's not how it works and I don't think it necessarily should be.

If you haven't found this out already (since I know you're writing a script) the person that makes it far in this business is someone who can sell themselves and their work. In order to get people into a theater you have to be able to sell your work and sell people on the idea that its great. Marketing = box office sales. Publicity = box office sales. If you don't master those two things, then quite frankly you don't deserve to be top box office earner. You have to get people in those seats and film quality alone isn't gonna do it.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:48:33 PM

"The other things you added after he posted the list is a mere way of trying to cover up the nonsense of that claim."

Quote and debunk, like what smart people at WP do. Don't just say "YA LOL UR COMMENTS SUK CUZ I SAY SO".

"Secondly my comment on your thoughts of the film weren't targeted at your claims of TDK is over rated"

Oh HMMMM You say:
"By the way just cause you think something is over rated doesn't mean it didn't deserve the money it garnished at the B.O."

And I never said that any other movie EXCEPT for TDK was over rated. So I don't know where this "Whole list" thing comes into play. Maybe yer too busy sucking the bat dildo you didn't notice any other movie except for TDK.

"I don't know who TGDirector is nor do I care really"

Get out. We don't need your jackassery.

"you don't know me at all so your remarks on my character are unnecessary and pointless."

Yea, and I don't know Mink, Ranger, SeWerin, or any other member on WP personally but I still talk and agree and sometimes disagree with them. See above comment.

"The rest of your post are nothing but useless babble so if you'd like to respond to my post in a more clear and concise manor I'd be willing to entertain you."

Yay, disregard my other posts instead of tackling them, that's the fanboy copout tactic #2 (only behind #1 which is typing in all caps and using swears a lot)

Or maybe you just can't process opposing opinion, maybe your fanboyishness has blinded you.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:52:21 PM

"By the way if you adjust for inflation Star Wars ranks number 2 on the top list, Titanic is Six. Number 1? Gone with the Wind."

Does this look like a bank?

"The bigger argument here is that you believe film quality should equate how well a film does at the box office"
No, I believe the better a movie is, the more people should see it.

"Marketing = box office sales. Publicity = box office sales."

No sh*t. did you get that out of "Film Marketing for Dummies"?

"You have to get people in those seats and film quality alone isn't gonna do it."

So basically you started with this:
"The bigger argument here is that you believe film quality should equate how well a film does at the box office"

and end with this:
"You have to get people in those seats and film quality alone isn't gonna do it."

LOL

Please get out.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:01:26 AM

By stating a film is meh, bad, or doesn't deserve to be there indicates you feel the film is below what it's been rated or viewed as, therefore over rated.

Secondly just because you agree/disagree with people doesn't give you the right to make personal assessments of them when you've never interacted with them in real life. Don't you have real friends in the world?

Third, I disregarded your other post cause they serve no purpose to this debate.

Fourth: If you understand publicity and marketing equaling box office sales, why are you bitching about Transformers 2's placement? Or the lack of Kubric or Cameron's films? You make no sense what so ever. Your personal attacks don't strengthen your argument they just make you seem more like a child lol. But if it helps you sleep at night please continue.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:09:58 AM

"Don't you have real friends in the world?"

Yes, want to know what it's like?

"Third, I disregarded your other post cause they serve no purpose to this debate."

How?

"Or the lack of Kubric or Cameron's films?"

I'm comparing them to the dark knight, to show that it's over rated...

"you seem more like a child lol. But if it helps you sleep at night please continue."

Now, I didn't even make this up, TDK ACTUALLY wrote these two things right after one another.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:13:07 AM

"By stating a film is meh, bad, or doesn't deserve to be there indicates you feel the film is below what it's been rated or viewed as, therefore over rated."

No, by stating a film is meh, bad, or doesn't deserve to be there indicates my own feeling on the movie, and nothing to do with it being over rated. By stating a movie is over rated indicates that I think (know) it's over rated.
chiefone writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:15:11 AM

"Who cares if I there were like 8 movies before TF2, why so technical? Crybaby"

Why so fond of making inaccurate comments? Retard

"My point is that people like cheap, simple, mind numbing entertainment, and dolts like you seem to eat it up"

Well I suggest you learn how to make valid points by knowing what the hell your commenting on before you make dumb statements. It makes you seem stupid and then people will tend to take offense to most of the things you say.

I dont mind objective opinions, but what I cant stand is uneducated false statements. Its like you coming on here and saying the sun revolves around the earth.
Think about it, if you're not sure about it then do your research.


SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:18:37 AM

"Well I suggest you learn how to make valid points by knowing what the hell your commenting on before you make dumb statements. It makes you seem stupid and then people will tend to take offense to most of the things you say."

Because most people are stupid and take offense to anything that doesn't agree with their bubble.

"Why so fond of making inaccurate comments? Retard"

OH NOES GUISE INNACURACY 8 MOVIES MAKES A DIFFRENCE LOLOLOL

"if you're not sure about it then do your research."

TF2 is still in theaters, and has yet to be released, with toys and marketing up the wazoo, that means that TF2 has a great chance of surpassing Titanic.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:19:52 AM

"and has yet to be released"

On dvd*
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:24:22 AM

No I don't need you to tell me what it's like cause based on your social interaction here I can safely assume I have a sh*t ton more friends than you do. Secondly this " SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:18:16 PM
I guess people are willing to forget large numbers and statistics to support their claims.

Like Mink accidentally forgetting the 50 million uninsured, or TDK forgetting that there are more than likely over a billion movies out there, or any Christian saying a 3000 year old fairy tale is greater than science"

Is f*cking useless to this debate.

Third: " SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 11:09:14 PM
"By the way just cause you think something is over rated"

Look at where it stands in highest grossing movies of all time, then watch the film back to back with anything kubrick has made or anything cameron has made."

Again what does it's box office gross have to do with it's quality? If you and I both know that marketing and publicity equal box office sales than it's position there instead of Kubric or Cameron films seems more than adequate.

Fourth: Yes if you want to continue to insult me cause it makes you sleep well at night go ahead cause frankly I don't give a f*ck lol.

Fifth point: "No, by stating a film is meh, bad, or doesn't deserve to be there indicates my own feeling on the movie, and nothing to do with it being over rated. By stating a movie is over rated indicates that I think (know) it's over rated."

Both things you're expressing here are your feelings on the movie. How does the film become unworthy of it's spot? It must be over rated when stacked up to something else right? I mean if something in your eyes is bad and is on the top 10 list B.O earners, you must believe that it's over rated or liked more so than it should? I mean I'm just basing this off what your saying to me.
chiefone writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:28:29 AM

Hey everyone, check out the below comment by our beloved moron Spooky.


"TF2 is still in theaters, and has yet to be released, with toys and marketing up the wazoo, that means that TF2 has a great chance of surpassing Titanic.
"and has yet to be released
On dvd"

It truely is amazing your lack of film/movie knowledge. Does anyone want to educate spooky on the complex intricacies of the All time box office charts?
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:31:46 AM

"All time box office charts?"

I'm saying in between the release of dvd and the release of the movie, there's still a lot of time for people to take their kids to this.
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:32:51 AM

Yeah Transformers 2 will be out of theaters by mid september and is not making nearly enough money to even beat TDk at the Box Office and I'm talking strictly domestic here. I doubt Transformers 2 will even beat TDK Blu-Ray sales which I believe is still the highest selling Blu-Ray and fastest selling Blu-Ray to date.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:33:17 AM

"Yes if you want to continue to insult me..."

Wait for it...

"...cause it makes you sleep well at night go ahead cause frankly I don't give a f*ck lol."

HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPO(CRITE)S!
chiefone writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:43:38 AM

umm spooky sorry to burst your bubbles. The box office chart doesnt take into account dvd sales or toys, its tallied purely by theater ticket sales

Also have to point out another moronic statement from by you

"TF2 is still in theaters, and has yet to be released, with toys and marketing up the wazoo"

umm, toys have been released and its been marketed up the wazoo ya fool
You're still spewing nonsense.


TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:48:15 AM

Yeah hypocrite because I don't care? Or are you assuming I do care? Dude this is the internet get real lol. Also ignore the rest of my post which unlike most of your stuff actually had to do with the debate at hand. You make me laugh.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:52:58 AM

"The box office chart doesnt take into account dvd sales or toys, its tallied purely by theater ticket sales."

"I'm saying in between the release of dvd and the release of the movie, there's still a lot of time for people to take their kids to this."

"Yeah hypocrite because I don't care? Or are you assuming I do care?"

No, I'd say because you can type in english, but can't understand it:

"Yes if you want to continue to insult me cause it makes you sleep well at night..."
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 12:58:53 AM

Yeah you're a fool and I shouldn't be debating with a child anyway. Adios folks.
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 1:01:22 AM

See you later
takai writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 1:21:47 AM

I'm not looking to argue, because I know TDK is sick of it, but I'm just going to chime in for a little tad bit.

1st - Watchmen wasn't as good as the Ultimate Cut will be this Fall. Snyder did an amazing job, and could pretty much pull off any comic adaptation, IMO. Marketing was terrible in two ways. One - They made it look like an action movie. and Two - They didn't actually market hardly at all. Well, I can't really explain the first, but the second makes complete sense. Snyder made this film for the fans, and no-one else. He didn't give a sh*t about anyone but the target audience, and that target audience, loved the film, and appreciated what he did. THAT is all he wanted. You say he doesn't comprehend what Watchmen was about, but the sheer fact that he made Black Freighter and Under the Hood shows he was all about the story, and just made it a lot flashier.

TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 27th, 2009 at 10:41:02 PM Watchmen was a sh*t film, the only character that felt fully fleshed was Rorsasch and that certainly isn't the case in the comic. -- -- You see that? That right there, nullifies any opinion you have on Watchmen. You yourself don't fully comprehend the damn thing.

(Insert needless TDK bashing here)

2nd - Oddly enough, I have to agree with you TDK. Box office numbers do NOT always show the quality of a film. Especially not in today's market. There are films that don't even see the silver screen, that are better than big box office smashers.
chiefone writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 1:22:12 AM

I'm saying in between the release of dvd and the release of the movie, there's still a lot of time for people to take their kids to this."


Transformers 2 blueray dvd realease date- October 20th

Today is August 28th, that means the dvd will be out in 1 month 22 days, so you're saying there's a chance that Tranformers 2 can make over $200 million in the span of 1 month and 22 days and surpase Titanic in th box office

Interesting
lost_addict writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 3:34:25 AM

batman begins 9/10

the dark knight 5/10
TH3D4RKKN1GH7 writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 11:24:05 AM

Yeah I totally don't understand Watchmen at all. *rolls eyes* Movie's weak nowhere near as important as the comic was thanks to Snyder's love with violence, cheesy sex scenes, weak casting, and sorry dialogue (everything that flies in comics doesn't pass on screen). The man is not a good director at all.
Lister writes:
on August 28th, 2009 at 6:24:37 PM

Spooky got his ass kicked.

There's a Good Reason Why Luke Skywalker Isn't on "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Poster

"The Walking Dead" Fan Kills Friend Who Turned Into a Zombie

"Indiana Jones" Producer Says Harrison Ford Will Not Be Recast

Ridley Scott Reveals Another Title for "Prometheus" Sequel

Johnny Depp and Edgar Wright Team for "Fortunately, the Milk"

"Spectre" Breaks Box Office Records Overseas

"Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Demolishes Pre-Sale Records

Paul Bettany Responds to Jason Statham's "Avengers" Insult

Daniel Craig Would Rather Commit Suicide Than Return as James Bond

Marvel Has Contingency Plans In Case It Regains Rights to Superheroes
Lace Wedding Dresses from ViViDress UK online shop, buy with confidence and cheap price.
WorstPreviews.com hosted by pair Networks WorstPreviews.com
Hosted by pair Networks
News Feeds | Box Office | Movie Reviews | Buzz: Top 100 | Popularity: Top 100
Poster Store | About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Web Tools | Site Map
Copyright © 2009 WorstPreviews.com. All rights reserved