 |
|
WV-Films writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 4:49:27 AM
God this sounds miserable. Who comes up with this crap?
Also I don't remember The Pacifier being a huge hit.
|
|
|
 |
|
Post_Man_87 writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 5:12:45 AM
The first film isn't the best, but is very fun to watch. A sequel could be OK - however this "kid" thing could go a very lame route.
@ WV - Surprisingly The Pacifier was a hit, garnering almost $200 million world of boxoffice (& was a sizeable hit on DVD) on a $50 million budget - half of which was Vin's paycheck. I'm just as surprised as you are.
|
|
|
|
|
WV-Films writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 5:19:47 AM
::sigh:: What's wrong with people....
|
|
|
 |
|
thomas deadison writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 5:51:39 AM
Yeah... National Enquirer...
Right.
|
|
|
 |
|
J_e_f writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 8:29:07 AM
Wow, you're really quoting National Enquirer? Whatever happened to this site?
|
|
|
 |
|
SpookyCupcakes writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 9:40:38 AM
that's using Bill O'Reilly as a political analyst...
|
|
|
 |
|
Osiris3eagle writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 9:45:34 AM
Yea, I immediately disregarded the article after seeing the source
|
|
|
 |
|
tcu21 writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 12:31:26 PM
The National Enquirer? Really? Didn't they also report a threesome between Pitt, Jolie, and Aniston? haha
|
|
|
 |
|
Dr.G writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 12:40:18 PM
I liked the first movie, though the plot was as fluid as the pacific ocean.
|
|
|
 |
|
Hez Marie writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 12:49:19 PM
This would be really cool!
|
|
|
 |
|
doneehoward writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 12:58:30 PM
lol@ the National Enquirer is reporting....
|
|
|
 |
|
acslaterson writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 1:35:24 PM
Hahaha, WP needs to take the National Enquirer off of their bookmarks!
|
|
|
 |
|
Skywalker121289 writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 1:42:07 PM
The first one stunk- no plot, only Pitt and Jolie flirting the whole film; why REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKES?!!
|
|
|
 |
|
BrandoFresh writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 2:50:17 PM
That sounds like fun. Hope it comes out.
|
|
|
 |
|
synthetic1985 writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 2:50:27 PM
even if they did make this movie...they'd be almost a decade older.....i wouldn't do a sequel to a movie unless i was sure that the sequel would be filming 0-5 years after the first movie
|
|
|
 |
|
BigUnit writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 3:06:27 PM
Angelinnnna :) boy would i love for her L's to be on my D
|
|
|
 |
|
lostwarrior writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 5:27:25 PM
this has bullshit all over it. no way would people see this film. Why not do a spin off on vaughn's character. that would still be a bad idea but way better than them doing this one.
|
|
|
 |
|
thedudeman69 writes:
on July 18th, 2009 at 7:42:50 PM
oh so their kids are getting roles?
|
|
|
 |
|
nirvo25 writes:
on July 19th, 2009 at 12:07:20 AM
talk about awkward....
|
|
|
 |
|
matternm58 writes:
on July 19th, 2009 at 12:56:37 AM
Oh my god I wonder what Jen is thinking or are they broke up again......I can't keep up with this fucking soap opera.
|
|
|
 |
|
gatesoftanhauser writes:
on July 19th, 2009 at 6:11:05 AM
I maintain that Mr and Mrs Smith may have been the worst movie I've ever seen. It was almost as bad as XXX 2: State of the Union and Highlander 2: The Quickening
|
|
|
|
|
Rich k writes:
on July 19th, 2009 at 4:32:50 PM
sounds like a god awful idea
|
|
|
 |
|
FBO writes:
on July 19th, 2009 at 6:15:43 PM
Mr and Mrs Smith is my favorite movie. It maight not be the best movie ever, but it's the one i like the most. And XXX2: State of the Union is better than this? Don't be retarded.
|
|
|
 |
|
Ranger writes:
on July 20th, 2009 at 1:48:10 AM
Make it Rated-R and let's see Brad work over the Mrs. in the sheets! Maybe they could conceive their next kid right on camera... HAWT!
|
|
|
|
|
FBO writes:
on July 20th, 2009 at 2:33:17 AM
But I agree, this is a dumb idea. Let Mr and Mrs Smith be a stand alone movie.
|
|
|
 |
|
Johnny Neat writes:
on July 20th, 2009 at 11:46:56 AM
I'm super super scared!
|
|
|
 |
|
Silly Wabbit writes:
on July 20th, 2009 at 1:24:45 PM
well you are retarded if u think this is a good movie. angelina jolie should move on to porn. only then ill see a picture starring her.
|
|
|
|
|
Ranger writes:
on July 20th, 2009 at 3:30:12 PM
I like how you think!
|
|
|
|
